Women should be in the combat and military because they are equal to men

However, this doesn't necessarily mean that everyone needed to fight.

Women should be in the combat and military because they are equal to men

Equal Opportunity in the Military - Constitutional Rights Foundation

The Supreme Court has said that the previous military exemption of women from combat roles was the only reason women could be excused from signing up for the draft. Things are quickly moving in a crazy direction.

We need to get serious and ask ourselves: If so, we need to get these decisions rescinded. The question we must ask now is: Making it about anything other than this detracts from the standards that keep the military competent and strong.

Bloodthirsty warriors out to slaughter you and your kids are not going care about your feelings. They are only going to care if they can kill you. Simply put, implementing bad ideas into military policies will ruin the effectiveness of that military. Many efforts to talk about such gritty details have been swept over by feminist sentiments and politically correct sub-language.

This orchestrated effort of political correctness is so influential now that even grown professionals have a hard time relaying facts to the public, because offending someone can cost your career. Also, putting women on the battlefield changes the psychology of every male soldier for the worse, period.

Customers who bought this item also bought

Some of the sources here deal directly with the horrors of war and bloodshed, and may not be pleasant for everyone to read. However, if this concerns you, I implore you to share this with everyone you know. Male and Female Bodies Are Different The first thing that needs to be addressed on this issue is the most obvious one: Since we are talking about violence and combat, we will focus most of our time on biology.

Men also have higher levels of testosterone that allow a greater capacity for hypertrophy muscle growth. While testosterone exists in both men and women, most men produce mg of testosterone daily, while women might produce 0. Because of this, high-T females are nowhere near the testosterone level of even low-T males.

Women should be in the combat and military because they are equal to men

Men are bathed in testosterone from the womb. Exposure to higher amounts of testosterone over a lifetime is why men are the way they are the same can be said for women and estrogen. Higher testosterone levels in men makes them more aggressive.

Higher testosterone also allows men to endure greater amounts of, and recover faster from, physically strenuous activities. They can do all of this at much higher rates than women can. Each sex was specifically designed to accentuate the crowning points of their respective hormones.

Too much of the wrong hormones can hurt men and women. For example, high estrogen in men can cause cancerand high levels of testosterone in women can lead to complications that involve infertility.

Because of their weaker bone structures, women are more prone to injury then men are.

Women should be in the combat and military because they are equal to men

Young women are more vulnerable to these injuries, many of which often lead to osteoporosiseven shortly after proper recovery: The higher the level of [athletic] competitionthe more [women] are at risk. But they are a reality.

Sex differences are real.

The Truth About Women in Ground Combat Roles | The National Interest

So real that people would complain about making sports unisex, because it would be unfair to the women. Parents complain when their little girls go up against transgender opponents, because trans-women have had or still have testicles throughout most of their life, which gives them a greater advantage in tests of physical performance.

Women who physically exert themselves too much over extended periods of time will be subject to muscular atrophy and other biological complications.

This is why we should not throw them into activities their bodies were not made to accommodate. Even if you had a female miraculously pass a male Marine physical fitness test, or complete a special school in the military, this would be a temporary, even eccentric victory.

This alone, even ignoring injury rates and other physical shortcomings of women, would put a mixed-sex military unit at a severe disadvantage in the battlefield, risking the lives of everyone involved, as well as possibly compromising mission objectives. The physical characteristics of men and women are so distinct that every local, national, international, or Olympic sport I can name separates men and women into different categories for the sake of fairness in competition and even concerns over personal safety for the female participants.

All of this begs the question; if low-grade danger zones like sports arenas have not deemed women capable of competing well against male opponents, why have we decided to allow them into combat zones, which are drastically more hazardous and complex?

Everyone up to this point in history has understood why: If women receive fair treatment in public or civil life, it is because strong men have provided safe arenas so society can grant this to them.

The world is deadly and cruel.Men and Women in the Military are Equal, but they are not the Same August 21, John Since President Obama is comfortable with Iran using its own “experts” to inspect its nuclear program, perhaps I shouldn’t even waste my breathe complaining about the corrosive effects of political correctness in today’s military.

South African women have a long history of service in the South African Defence Force (SADF) and in the modern South African National Defence Force (SANDF). In World War I and World War II women served in auxiliary roles in the South African Defence Force and were assigned to non-combat active roles after In a volunteer nursing service was established by the army and nurses to.

A scholar makes a definitive, controversial argument against women in combat More than , female troops have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan since Whatever they are, it's unlikely there will ever be equal numbers of men and women in these combat positions, one expert said.

A large reason for that is that men still have an edge when it comes. The Defense Department recently announced new policies that will open more than 14, military job opportunities to women.

Which seems like a great step—except that more than , positions will still remain exclusive to men, from front-line infantry positions to high-level special operations roles. Men, real men, real soldiers, then had to go in and rescue a scared nineteen-year-old girl from behind enemy lines because of progressives’ insistence that we are all the same and that women should be in the military despite all the obvious evidence that they shouldn’t.

Should women be allowed to serve in combat roles in the armed forces? | vetconnexx.com